I am a big fan of US economist and academic Glenn Loury. He is smart, honest and well-articulated. He is also not afraid of an intellectual scrap if he stumbles upon one. He is an indispensable public commentator and intellectual whose ideas and influence go far beyond the confines of race, and associated social issues, in the US where he has staked his claim to fame and authority most comprehensively. Glenn has an impressive back-catalogue of writing and citations, but the best way to get a sense of him is by listening to his podcast the Glenn Show, which can be found on all the usual platforms. I am also a big fan of his co-conspirator, John McWorter, a US linguist and public intellectual, with whom Glenn runs a bi-weekly conversation on his podcast, and Q&A for paying subscribers. It is a must-listen. On this occasion, however, I want to recommend Glenn’s recent discussion with Larry Kotlikoff, a US academic economist, in which they discuss the economic policy ideas of the two candidates in the upcoming US presidential election ideas, and the US economy more generally. As the title of the podcast goes; if only we had an economist in the White House!
Read MoreLast week we learned that China’s population shrunk last year, for the first time in 60 years, by 850K, the net result of 9.6M live births, and 10.4M deaths. It is worth taking these numbers with a pinch of salt. Accurately accounting for some 1.4B people is difficult, especially down to a sub-1M difference between deaths and births. It’s possible that future revisions will show that China’s population has been shrinking since the beginning of the 2020s, or that it won’t start shrinking until 2025 or beyond. What is clear for anyone with even cursory knowledge of Chinese demographics, however, is that this headline was coming sooner rather than later. China’s fertility rate has long since declined below the replacement level, and all-age mortality is now rising as the population ages. But does it matter that China’s population is now shrinking?
Read MoreIt’s been ages since I checked in on markets, but I am a happy, and a little dismayed, to report that investors and analysts are trampling around in the same weeds. Is inflation transitory or not? Will supply-side disruptions persist? And what about fiscal and monetary policy; will one loosen and the other tighten? In fairness, we have seen a shift in the economic outlook, for the worse. The reopening bump in economic activity, as virus restrictions were eased, is over, leaving economists to ponder what pace of growth to expect as the pandemic-induced macro volatility recedes. This moment was always coming, but almost on cue, we now have to contend with a litany of downside risks in the form of a real-income sapping rise in energy prices and a real estate crunch in China. These headwinds haven’t put much of a dent in risk assets, yet. The MSCI World and S&P 500 are down a paltry 1.5% and 2.5% from their highs at the start of September, respectively, and are still holding on to handsome year–to-date gains, 14.7% and 18.9%, respectively.
Read MoreIt's difficult to think of a more politically incorrect idea than recommending investors to allocate money to China's government bond market, ostensibly by selling a portion of their U.S. treasuries. Granted, this would actually be consistent with the rebalancing of the bilateral U.S.-Sino trade relationship that the most ardent critiques of China's economic model desperately want. Or perhaps what they really want is a strong dollar plus capital controls? It is difficult to tell sometimes. That said, it is fair to say that lending money to China's government to fund domestic investment, some of which invariably will go to defence, probably doesn't get you on the White House's Christmas list. Incidentally, and before I flesh out the trade, I should make one thing clear. I think the mismatch between the increasingly tense geopolitical relationship between China and the U.S., and the fact that capital and goods still flow more or less freely—with the exception of direct outflows from China's mainland—between them represent an enormous tail risk for markets.
Read More