Posts in European politics and society
Things to think about #5

There’s been a lot of talk about the political center* in Europe in the past few weeks, in the wake of the French parliamentary elections and the landslide victory for Labour in the UK. Is it reinvigorated, complacent, or perhaps just lucky? I offer two thoughts on this.

Firstly, sometimes a long-in-the-tooth incumbent is sacrificed on the altar of change no matter how reasonable or uncontroversial he or she is. In the context the most recent elections in Europe, this applies mostly to France, where the people has a tendency to throw their leaders under the bus, for no other reason that they’ve been in power for a bit too long. But I think it applies to England too, to an extent. Rishi Sunak and his cabinet weren’t that bad, or more specifically, the Sunak government was a lot of less controversial and risk-seeking than its Tory predecessors. But in the end, the weight of dissatisfaction and disillusion with previous iterations of Conservative cabinets were too much to bear. The Tories received the drubbing they deserved, having put their faith in a toxic mix of volatility and incompetence under Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. The doomed political and economic project of Brexit looms large in this story too. Whatever Labour decides to do with this smelling carcass of a political legacy, it brought the destruction of the Conservative party, and the right in UK politics, as we know it. Perhaps for that reason, Starmer will be inclined to leave it smelling for a bit longer, to remind people of what they’ll get should they consider jumping back into the Tory fold.

Read More
Politics and society, US politics and society, European politics and society, UKclaus vistesenHedgehog Review, European politics, US politics, Anton Barba-Kay, centrism, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Ben Hunt, Epsilon Theory, politics, U.S. elections, U.S. politics
Things to think about #4

The Economist’s Free Exchange column drops in on the question of an economic motherhood penalty from childbirth. It is nice to see that the Economist correctly distinguishes between two distinct economic motherhood penalties, both of which can be traced to the interplay between evolutionary forces and modernity, where the latter in this case is defined as an environment with rapidly increasing returns to investment in human capital and education. The first, between fathers and mothers, emerge because the cost of child-rearing especially in the early part of a child’s life overwhelmingly falls on the mother, a conclusion which follows from Trivers (1972). This is true in terms of the cost during pregnancy and immediately after too. It is also true before we consider the possibility that the resource allocation trade-off for many women shifts in the wake of motherhood. The second motherhood penalty occurs between women. Put simply, in an economic structure where childless women have the ability to devote all their resources to somatic investment and take advantage of the above-mentioned increasing returns to human capital investment, the wage and wealth divergence between women who have many children and those who have none will widen significantly, at least in theory. For more on this, I cover the theory in more detail in my essay on fertility and sexual selection; see here.

Read More
Demographics, European politics and society, Politics and society, Things to think aboutclaus vistesenAI, LLM, the Economist, Free Exchange, motherhood penalty, birth rates, birth postponement, Fertility, gender, birth penalty, language, culture, Michael Crawford, Hedgehog Review
The looming downturn in capex and the rise of EVs

I think Simon Ward is right to predict that a downturn in investment will be the next shoe to drop in developed market business cycles, even as easing inflation offers respite for households’ inflation-adjusted disposable income and spending. This has been a key theme for me and my colleagues at Pantheon Macroeconomics for a while. In the U.S., Ian Shepherdson believes that this will drive the economy into a mild recession, while we are a bit more sanguine in Europe for the simple reason that the euro area economy effectively has been close to recession since the end of last year. Simon Ward notes that the capital goods component of the global PMI hit a new low in April, that inflation-adjusted profits in G7 slowed sharply last year, and that nominal money is contracting. Crucially, he adds that credit standards are now tightening significantly in Europe, as well as across the pond. Flat-lining profits in inflation-adjusted terms, a contraction in nominal deposits, the lagged effect of higher interest rates and tightening credit standards is bad news for private capex, including inventories, as measured by the national accounts. The silver lining is that a slowdown in investment should, combined with softening inflation, persuade DM central banks to kick back from the table on rate hikes. The key question, however, remains whether a slowdown in investment and aggregate demand is adequately priced-in by equities. I doubt it.

Read More
Economics, Business, and Finance , Economic Theory and Acadmics, European politics and society, Global Economy, Politics and society, US Economyclaus vistesenSimon War, Money Moves Markets, Janus Henderson, Noah Smith, EV, electric vehicles, ULEZ, energy transition, green energy, climate change, environment
Five Questions for 2023, and some Answers

In my day-job I am forced to write my economic outlook for the new year in December, alongside most other economists. This is part of a long-standing sell-side tradition, and at Christmas time, you don’t change traditions. The real way to do it, however, is to way a few weeks into January to see where the dust settles and how investors vote with their money in the early sessions of the year. I thus present the Alpha Sources version; five key questions for 2023, and as many answers. I’ll start with the war in Russia, asking what in fact Russia will achieve, if anything. I then ask whether 60/40 portfolio will rebound in 2023, and whether the leadership in global equities is changing. I then qualify my answer with a question on geopolitics and the free flow of goods and capital between China and the US, before asking whether Covid is over.

Read More
European politics and society, Global Economy, Markets and Tradingclaus vistesen60/40 portfolio, equities, bonds, inflation, Covid, Ukraine, Russia, war, Leopard tanks, value, growth, EM, European equities, US equities