At this point, you will have read numerous takes, predictions and analyses of what four more years of Mr. Trump in the White House means. I promise that I will make this short. I think Sam Harris’ “The Reckoning” offers a good explanation of what went wrong for the Democrats and the liberals. I also enjoyed the discussion between Glenn Loury and Daniel Bessner, even if I strongly disagree with Mr. Bessner on a number of key areas. If you want a longer explanation of the ills that have befallen US Democrats, unrelated to the diagnosis of excessive wokeness and identity politics, you should read Thomas Franks’ “Listen, Liberal”, published on the eve of the Democrat’s first loss to Mr. Trump in 2016. It’s all there, with a straight line back to Frank’s earlier identification of the problem when he asked “What’s the Matter with Kansas?” Apart from that, we should also add that Mr. Trump simply ran a superior campaign to Kamala Harris. After all, you don’t win all the swing states through luck or due to bad opposition alone.
Read MoreI hope you’re enjoying the 2023 Chat-GPT advent calendar even if it is quite a deviation from the content normally posted here. Fret not, I will pepper the flow of advent stories with some economics, and a lookahead to markets next year.
I really enjoyed @EconTalker's conversation with @tylercowen, the founder of the most widely read economics blog out there, reminding us that there is still value in reading the grand old masters of economics. I enjoyed re-reading most of Keynes’ the General Theory for my essay on fiscal policy, and it was also fun to remind myself about Milton Friedman’s permanent-income-hypothesis for the essay on the life cycle hypothesis. But in reality, I fall foul of Tyler’s accusation of an economist who is probably not as well acquainted with the classics as I should be. I have read very little of Smith for example, I find Hayek very difficult to read, and as an economist interested in demographics, I also regret to say that I have only read few parts of Malthus in the primary versions. Fortunately for me and others, Tyler has made his new his new book—"GOAT" of economics—freely available, and I am looking forward to dig in over Christmas.
Read MoreSomeone has to say it, and it might as well be me. Markets have a distinct goldilocks feel about them at the moment, or in the words of the FT’s editors; markets are beginning to eye the “immaculate disinflation”, which is a prerequisite for a soft landing. This is a story about two trends; easing inflation and economies which are, well… neither too hot nor too cold. Soft US and UK inflation reports for the month of June have been key catalysts for the change in mood. Headline CPI inflation in the US fell to a two-year low of 3.0%, with core inflation dropping by 0.5pp, to 4.8%, a 20-month low. In the UK, meanwhile, headline inflation slipped to 7.9%, from 8.7% in May, while core inflation dipped by 0.2pp, to 6.9%. These numbers don’t exactly scream goldilocks, but markets trade at the margin of the economic data; it is the direction of travel that matters.
Read MoreI have a lot of sympathy for pen-wielding strategists at the moment. Every day the empty white sheet of digital paper is staring at them, the little cursor tauntingly flickering in the top-left corner. The most obvious course of action, to copy-paste their previous note, is just about the only thing they can’t do. We economists at least have a steady flow of new data, however mundane and useless, to write about. In other words, the main questions remain the same, and they remain largely unanswered. Economic activity has collapsed, and is now staging what appears to be a painfully slow rebound. Even in the best of worlds, however, it’s difficult to escape the notion that significant damage has been wrought in on both the demand and supply-side. This puts equities on the spot. A reflexive rebound from the nadir in March was always coming, but could it be sustained, and would we re-test the lows? In a normal recession the answer to those questions would be “no” and “yes”, but there is nothing normal about this recession. U.S. equities have roared higher, and the ubiquitous growth stocks, which outperformed before, are leading the charge again. The S&P 500 growth index is up a cool 32% from its March lows, and is now flat year-to-date. By contrast, the S&P value index is up “just” 21% from the lows, and are still carrying a 20% loss year-to-date.
Read More