I detect a lot of worry about the global economic outlook. This is understandable. Equities are close to, or at, record highs with extended valuations. Growth fears have crept higher on investors’ list of concerns, most notably with signs of softness in the US labour market as well as persistently weak domestic demand in Europe. Add a still-fragile Chinese economy to the mix, despite hopes of stimulus, and the prospect of a leap in economic uncertainty after next month’s US presidential elections, it is no wonder investors are on edge. But what if I told you that global leading indicators are strong and healthy and that combined with falling inflation and falling interest rates, this is one of the best macro-setups for risk assets. I suspect many would reply that such tailwinds already are comfortably priced-in to equity and credit markets. I am sympathetic to that point, but hear me out.
Read MoreI don’t have a definitive answer to the question posed above, but I think it is fair to say that markets traded last week as if the answer is: ‘yes’. In Europe, bund yields plunged below 1.5%, after touching almost 2% earlier in the month, and Dec-22 euribor futures are now pricing-in 50bp less tightening than immediately after the June ECB meeting. The catalyst: a below-consensus PMI report and news that Russia is slowly, but surely turning off gas supply to Europe. In the UK, bond yields have fallen too, in response to a below-consensus core CPI print. And finally, in the US, Jerome Powell’s comment, in a testimony to Congress, that a recession is ‘a possibility’ as the Fed embarks on a series of rate hikes, and QT, similarly drove down bond yields across the curve.
Read MoreFirst things first, the bull market and, predominantly retail driven, frenzy in cryptocurrencies, SPACs, NFTs, and BANG stocks—BlackBerry, AMC, Nokia, and GameStop—are to me all derivatives of the fact that the policy mandarins of the world are showering the real economy and financial markets with unprecedented levels of liquidity. To be clear, I do not mean to disparage traders who are able to extract value from these markets; all power to them. What I am saying is that if global monetary policymakers were not doing QE by the trillions, on an annualised basis, the bull market in many of these things would evaporate like mist on a hot summer morning. Meanwhile, in old-school assets—themselves beneficiaries of QE—the overarching theme at the moment seems that the vol-sellers are back in charge. The VIX has hurtled lower, to just over 15, and at this rate it will soon be in the low teens. The same is the case for the MOVE index for fixed income volatility, which is also now clearly driving lower, hitting a 13-month low of 53.4 in May.
Read MoreThe teaser from this week’s missive is posted below as usual, but I have a few housekeeping notes to start the year. First off, I know that I am doing less market-oriented stuff recently; I apologise. The good news is that I am diverting my energy towards a long-form essay on fiscal policy. It’ll be in the same type of format as my two previous essays on the Life Cycle Theory and the Balance of Payment. In short, I am appalled by the level of debate about economic policy these days, so I am trying to inject some context and colour on the current flurry about fiscal policy, what it is—as in what it really is—how economists think about it, and what it can and can’t do. This potentially covers huge ground, but I reckon that I have managed to distill the story into a coherent argument. It’s 80% done, and I hope it will be worth the wait. I expect to have the first draft done next month, and then it goes to the editor for a ruthless take-down. The final version should be done in March, with a bit of luck.
Read More