Markets have been propelled by a fairly simple story in the past nine months, split across two themes. First, market prices have been driven by the expectation that vaccination will once-and-for all allow us to put the virus in our rearview mirror, and secondly, that fiscal and monetary policy will remain primed for support. This story was always going to be challenged at some point in 2021 as vaccination programs reach their climax and policymakers inevitably begin to consider what degree of stimulus that is needed in a world not in the grips of a pandemic. And wouldn’t you know it; here we are. As far as the success of the vaccines is concerned, it is crucial to remember that the final path to a full reopening is as much a question of politics as it is about epidemiology. Indeed, at this point, I am inclined to believe that it is mostly about politics. This isn’t surprising. Cases were never going to zero—at least not as long as we keep testing at the rate we’re doing at the moment—and new variants were always going to elude the vaccines, one way or the other.
Read MoreIt's difficult to think of a more politically incorrect idea than recommending investors to allocate money to China's government bond market, ostensibly by selling a portion of their U.S. treasuries. Granted, this would actually be consistent with the rebalancing of the bilateral U.S.-Sino trade relationship that the most ardent critiques of China's economic model desperately want. Or perhaps what they really want is a strong dollar plus capital controls? It is difficult to tell sometimes. That said, it is fair to say that lending money to China's government to fund domestic investment, some of which invariably will go to defence, probably doesn't get you on the White House's Christmas list. Incidentally, and before I flesh out the trade, I should make one thing clear. I think the mismatch between the increasingly tense geopolitical relationship between China and the U.S., and the fact that capital and goods still flow more or less freely—with the exception of direct outflows from China's mainland—between them represent an enormous tail risk for markets.
Read MoreIt’s been a while since I looked at markets, as I am busily trying to finish the second chapter of my new demographics project—see here—but peering across my portfolio, I haven’t missed much. Granted, the straight-line rise in green and clean energy stocks—a theme that I am invested in—has petered out, but otherwise, most of what I own keep going up, and the number at the bottom of the column keeps getting bigger. Investing in a pandemic-stricken world, it seems, isn’t too bad. When I haven’t looked at markets for a while, I tend to go back to the basics. The first chart below plots the six-month stock-to-bond return ratio in the US, which has been locked at +20% since the beginning of the fourth quarter. This is punchy, even unprecedented, but I am loath to second guess this trend at the moment. Sustained positive stock-to-bond returns tend to be associated with resilient bull markets, and let’s be honest; that’s what we have, for now. I worry, as I suspect does everyone else, that investors have bought too aggressively into the rumor of a post-virus recovery, implying that they will sell the fact. If that’s true, conditions will become more difficult over the summer, and in the second half of the year, though I am inclined to believe that any swoon will a familiar case of BTFD™.
Read MoreI’ll keep it short this week, mainly because I don’t have much new to say. I continue to think that the tug-of-war between markets and monetary policymakers in fixed income markets remains the key spectacle to watch, even if I concede that we have been watching it for a while. There are economists and strategists who will tell you that policymakers are perfectly happy with steepening yield curves, and that they in fact welcome them. To believe this, however, requires that you forget the initial stages of the pandemic-policy response in which central bankers solemnly pledged to print as much money as needed—via QE—to keep rates pinned across all maturities in order to support the monumental fiscal efforts needed to prevent economic disaster. If you’re telling me that this tacit agreement is now broken on the eve of the new US administration is about to shovel €1.9T into an almost fully vaccinated economy—that’s just shy of 10% of GDP for those wondering—I have to concede that yields can, and likely will, move a lot higher. But is that really what you’re telling me? It seems to me that observers have quietly pivoted towards the idea that central banks obviously accept, even want, higher bond yields to reflect the recovery. I am sorry, but that doesn’t pass the smell test. While a steepening yield curve sows the seeds of its own destruction via an ever more attractive roll and carry, especially with fwd guidance on the front end, there is always a risk that markets end up questing the commitment to low policy rates.
Read More