It has been clear for a while that Covid-19 would be a big shock to the global economy, but early predictions of a quick rebound, and a return to normal, now look fanciful. I am now inclined to believe that just about everything will change. My old colleague, and good friend, Jonathan Tepper is musing on a similar note in a recent piece on Unherd.com. I recommend that you go read it; it’s a great piece. For my part, I’ll split my arguments into two observations, not necessarily market-related, but both are key to understand the evolution of markets and the economy in the next few quarters, and I would suggest, beyond as well. We are not even through the first quarter yet, but it’s fair to say that the first chart on my next page already is the chart of the year. It portrays the “optimal” strategy to combat the virus relative to doing nothing, and a policy of loose mitigation. Leaving the Chinese and South Korean outbreaks aside—as well as the grim disaster unfolding in Iran—I think it’s fair to make two overall points. Firstly, there has been a significant debate about the correct strategy to combat the virus. The responses have been scattered on a spectrum ranging from (unconfirmed?) pictures of Chinese authorities welding doors shut to apartment blocks to halt the spread, over to “herd immunity”. Or, as former SAS soldier Ant Middleton’s suggests; “fuck Covid-19”, a statement that he, in fairness, has now retracted.
Read MoreWhat a week, eh? It feels as if my last dispatch at the beginning of the month was written a lifetime ago. The sell-off in equities was already severe by then, and I was in a buy-the-dip mood. My initial intuition proved correct; the rebound happened, as did the new low. My prediction of subsequent choppy sideways movement was brutally refuted, however, sell-off, a surge in volatility and dislocation across multiple markets to an extent not experienced the financial crisis. There are so many things we don’t know, so let’s start with the few things we do. Covid-19 is now morphing into a hit to the real economy not seen since the financial crisis. The virus’ foothold in Europe is strengthening, and country by country are now shutting down their economies in a desperate attempt to avoid the disastrous scenario unfolding in Italy. The U.S. and the U.K. are acting as if they’re somehow immune or different, I fear they aren’t. In any case, it is besides the point. The global economy is now in recession, and the scrambling action by fiscal and monetary policy is really just an attempt to prevent an economic shock turning to a prolonged crunch with a wave of private sector bankruptcies and soaring joblessness.
Read MoreLast week’s price action was one for the history books, or at the very least, it will be up there among the more “memorable” sessions. Events like this leave investors and analysts dazed, confused, and probably, a bit bruised too. The obvious question now is: what happens next? To which the only obvious answer is; who knows. That said, I reckon this question itself has to be answered in two parts. The first is whether it’s time to buy the dip in risk assets, a question that invites all sort of cliches. It probably depends on your timeframe, not to mention the more obvious point; do you fell lucky? For the record, I re-arranged the portfolio slightly last week, raising cash levels, and selling short-term U.S. bonds in favour of select forays into existing, and a few new equity positions. Time will tell whether this was a good decision. It certainly seems premature when considering the terrible Chinese PMIs released overnight Friday, though I think last week’s swoon has more to do with the spread of Covid-19 outside China. In any case, when Vix has a sniff at 50, I reckon that I have to do something. To evaluate whether to buy the dip a bit more thoroughly, I had a look at the put/call ratio on the S&P, which is now teasing short-term traders with the strongest buy-signal since the 2010 Flash Crash and the late summer panic in 2011.
Read MoreIt has become increasingly fashionable to direct scorn and ridicule at the so-called equity permabears. This is understandable, to a point. These hardened observers and investors have thrown everything at the market, only to see prices go higher almost tick-for-tick with the intensity of their objections. Their curse is increasingly obvious. They can succeed intellectually only if they bite the bullet and buy the very uptrend that they so despise. Alternatively, they can change their mind and embrace the bull market, which would probably have every other investor running for the hills. The market, by implication, would cave in, but they would not be able to claim intellectual victory as those who saw the crash coming, let alone profit from it. Whatever fate awaits the equity bears in this cycle, I am starting to warm to their disposition, at least for the purpose of judging equities in the next six months. As such, while the onus usually, and justifiably, is on the equity bears to explain why it is that the market is compelled to spontaneously combust, the burden of evidence is now increasingly shifting to the bulls. Why is it exactly that global equities are ordained to push ever higher in an environment where fundamentals and other markets suggest that they shouldn’t?
Read More