As my previous post can attest, my mind has been focused elsewhere in recent weeks—and I am also preparing a my next long-form essay to boot—but I thought that I’d have a peak at markets all the same. The Fed’s (non)decision on yield curve control came and went without any significant shift. The FOMC has now locked down the funds rate until the end of 2022, at least, more or less in line with what markets were already expecting anyway. That said, the shift to “time-contingent” forward guidance—over 30 months no less—is a significant step. It caps a remarkable transition from a Fed on auto-pilot in late 2018—with the 2-year yield aiming for 3%—to one now “not even thinking about thinking about raising rates.” A lot of water has gone under the bridge since then, but it’s difficult to escape the conclusion that the shift in U.S. and global monetary policy over the past 24 months is fundamental. The idea of a central bank put was born a long time ago, but it’s difficult to imagine a version stronger than its current form. Quite simply, policymakers wonʼt tolerate, and canʼt afford, tightening financial conditions, of any kind, and over any time horizon, however short and temporary. I have spent considerable ink on these pages arguing that this makes the rebound in equities, in the face of a crashing economy, more-or-less reasonable. In fact, it’s normal for equities to exhibit their strongest return-profiles early in the rebound, as a positive function of sharply rising excess liquidity as policy shifts, but also simply thanks to a low base. After all, it has to pay for those with the guts to buy at the lows.
Read MoreThe jury is still out, but I reckon that last week’s price action provided a foundation for markets to finally get an answer to the question that’s on everyone’s mind. The sustained climb in equities, and precipitous decline in the dollar, are interesting in their own right, but am keeping my eyes on the US bond market. The long bonds sold off steadily through the week, a move that culminated with Friday’s curveball of a NFP report—payrolls rose by 2.5M breezing past the consensus of a 7.5M fall—and a further leap in yields. All told, the US 10y rose by almost 30bp last week, to just under 0.9%, and with the front-end more-or-less locked, the 2s10s and 2s5s steepened to 70bp and 30bp, respectively, which is the widest since early 2018. A closer look at the chart won’t really raise any eyebrows. Sure, the curve is steepening, but it’s not like the move is unprecedented, and the curve is still overall quite flat. In the present context, however, last week’s move is a clarion call to the Fed. Will they allow (long-end) bond yields to reflect the deluge of debt issuance, and associated economic rebound, or will they, as some have suggested, put the Treasury market on a “war footing” via a yield cap? In other words, it’s do or die for the decision on yield curve control. Of course, that’s not entirely true. The Fed has been waffling on this issue for ages, and there is no guarantee that they won’t continue to do just that. That said, I have to say that last week’s squeeze in bonds offers a very tasty and clear setup for this week’s FOMC meeting. Will the Fed let long yields run or will they put a lid on them, either verbally, or via an outright YCC announcement?
Read MoreI have a lot of sympathy for pen-wielding strategists at the moment. Every day the empty white sheet of digital paper is staring at them, the little cursor tauntingly flickering in the top-left corner. The most obvious course of action, to copy-paste their previous note, is just about the only thing they can’t do. We economists at least have a steady flow of new data, however mundane and useless, to write about. In other words, the main questions remain the same, and they remain largely unanswered. Economic activity has collapsed, and is now staging what appears to be a painfully slow rebound. Even in the best of worlds, however, it’s difficult to escape the notion that significant damage has been wrought in on both the demand and supply-side. This puts equities on the spot. A reflexive rebound from the nadir in March was always coming, but could it be sustained, and would we re-test the lows? In a normal recession the answer to those questions would be “no” and “yes”, but there is nothing normal about this recession. U.S. equities have roared higher, and the ubiquitous growth stocks, which outperformed before, are leading the charge again. The S&P 500 growth index is up a cool 32% from its March lows, and is now flat year-to-date. By contrast, the S&P value index is up “just” 21% from the lows, and are still carrying a 20% loss year-to-date.
Read MoreInvestors currently seem perturbed by two trends. Firstly, they are watching the crash in oil prices with part glee, part amazement, if not outright horror, depending on how much skin they have in the game. The second is that almost everyone seems sceptical about the sustainability, I even dare say “fairness”, of the rally in equities. I have little insight into the oil market, but something or someone is about to break. Demand isn’t coming back until the start of Q3, at the earliest, and while I get the supply-side dynamics of a broken OPEC oligopoly, I struggle to see that this Last Man Standing™ price war serves the purpose of any of the interlocutors. In any case, I’ll stick to the tape for this one, watching the price like everyone else. It’ll be a blast! On equities, it’s important to step back a bit and accept that Q1 was an outlier. The MSCI World fell 8.5% on the month in February, and then went on to crater nearly 14% in March, a denouement which includes a 32% round-trip from the highs in Mid-February to the lows in March. That’s record-busting pain, and no matter what type of bear market we’re in—and I do think we’re in just that—a rebound was coming, eventually. As I type, the MSCI World is up nearly 7% on the month in April, which doesn’t seem outlandish to me.
Read More