I think Simon Ward is right to predict that a downturn in investment will be the next shoe to drop in developed market business cycles, even as easing inflation offers respite for households’ inflation-adjusted disposable income and spending. This has been a key theme for me and my colleagues at Pantheon Macroeconomics for a while. In the U.S., Ian Shepherdson believes that this will drive the economy into a mild recession, while we are a bit more sanguine in Europe for the simple reason that the euro area economy effectively has been close to recession since the end of last year. Simon Ward notes that the capital goods component of the global PMI hit a new low in April, that inflation-adjusted profits in G7 slowed sharply last year, and that nominal money is contracting. Crucially, he adds that credit standards are now tightening significantly in Europe, as well as across the pond. Flat-lining profits in inflation-adjusted terms, a contraction in nominal deposits, the lagged effect of higher interest rates and tightening credit standards is bad news for private capex, including inventories, as measured by the national accounts. The silver lining is that a slowdown in investment should, combined with softening inflation, persuade DM central banks to kick back from the table on rate hikes. The key question, however, remains whether a slowdown in investment and aggregate demand is adequately priced-in by equities. I doubt it.
Read MoreIt's little over a year ago that that I almost choked on my coffee when I read in the FT that Blackrock, one of the world’s largest asset managers, was recommending investors to increase their allocation to Chinese equities and bonds. This wasn’t because I thought this was a bad investment, per se, The comment by Wei Li, chief investment strategist at Blackrock, that Chinese assets are under-represented in portfolios given the relative size of China’s financial market is probably true. More interestingly, in a world where (some) economists are worried about the imbalanced trade relationship between the US and China—due mainly to subdued Chinese domestic demand and excessive savings—a reversal in capital flows between the world’s major economies is exactly what the doctor ordered. This is especially the case if, as is customarily hoped, it coincides with a liberalisation of and the opening of China’s capital account, and more freely floating CNY.
Read MoreI am still not entirely sure whether Noah Smith, a U.S. Economist and prolific blogger, is a converted MMTer or not. But I do know that he is doing a great job in describing the discourse around this newfound holy grail of macroeconomic policymaking. In my attempt to label MMT as “Woke Economics”, I leaned on some of Noah’s earlier pieces on this, and now he is back with his invocation of the new Macro Wars. The stage, according to Noah, is the recent fiscal relief bill in the US, prompting even otherwise pro-stimulus economists to push back. Oliver Blanchard and Lawrence Summers both suggest that $1.9T might be too much of a good thing, while Krugman is sticking to his Keynesian ethos, arguing that Biden’s bill really is ‘disaster relief’, a position that Noah seems to agree with. Replying specifically to Noah’s recent post, he argues that Keynesianism won the theoretical battle a decade ago, leaving only “cranks, charlatans and WSJ Op-ed writers” on the other side. Tyler Cowen chimes in, pointing out that Biden’s post-election fiscal stimulus push has as much to do with populism as it has to do with careful application of Keynesian macroeconomics. As it turns out, this is a position I have a lot of sympathy for.
Read More