Everyone has a plan until they get kicked in the nuts by a new virus variant, apparently. The speed with which markets deteriorated on Friday on the news that the B.1.1.529 variant—first detected in South Africa and Botswana, but now confirmed in both Europe and Asia—was telling. So is the swiftness with which many countries already are digging deep in the pre-vaccination toolbox of travel restrictions and, inevitably, domestic restrictions of some form. Indeed, even before the new variant, recently renamed ominously to Omicron, arrived on the scene, Europe was inching closer to new restrictions. Austria and Netherlands were in full or semi-lockdown before Friday, and given the direction of numbers in the major economies, it was only a matter of time before more widespread restrictions were introduced. So, here we are; 18 months of rolling lockdowns and travel restrictions, trillion of dollars in public support, and around 70% of the adult population double-jabbed—and shall we say another 10% with immunity from previous infection?—and we’re back to square one. Someone, somewhere, will soon have to start asking questions, but maybe not yet.
Read MoreThe skirmishes in the macro wars are getting dirtier. More recently, the debate on inflation has pitted #TeamTransitory and its detractors—I’ve seen the other side described as #TeamPermanent and #TeamSustained—in a mud-slinging and, often emotionally charged, spat. I suspect that #TeamTransitory will win, eventually—whatever that means—though I also think this side of the debate has most to answer for in terms of the deteriorating debate. The rules seem to change as the consensus-beating inflation prints roll in. As I as explained here, it is unreasonable to term all versions of the world in which inflation is not making a new high on a monthly basis, as a transitory. More importantly, however, the checkmate-like rebuttal to anyone arguing that rates could and should go higher that they must be in favour of higher unemployment is particularly odd to me. The question we need to ask it seems is whether there are conditions under which policy tightening—both fiscal and monetary—to rein in demand are optimal or desirable, in an economic sense, even if it means, presumably, unemployment going up. The answer is; yes.
Read MoreSometimes in markets, everyone looks up the same price in the morning to get a feeling of where sentiment is. It’s often one of the big ones; the S&P 500, the long bond, the price of oil, DXY, or gold, or even Bitcoin. Recently, everyone has been following the bloodbath in short-term interest rate markets as implied rates in one developed market after the other have gone haywire. Things have settled down slightly in the past week following the FOMC meeting, and the hilarious unch-BOE decision in the face of a near-certainty of a rate hike only a few weeks ago. I reckon implied rates will fall a bit further in the near term. The U.S. 2y, for instance, seems like it wants to go down before it’ll try to snap back, implying that the violent decline in short-term interest rate futures—though not necessarily those for 2022—should ease a bit too. But it is difficult to escape the feeling that the genie is out the bottle. Expectations have shifted, and while central banks won’t have to meet them as priced, they will have to deliver something.
Read MoreIt’s been ages since I checked in on markets, but I am a happy, and a little dismayed, to report that investors and analysts are trampling around in the same weeds. Is inflation transitory or not? Will supply-side disruptions persist? And what about fiscal and monetary policy; will one loosen and the other tighten? In fairness, we have seen a shift in the economic outlook, for the worse. The reopening bump in economic activity, as virus restrictions were eased, is over, leaving economists to ponder what pace of growth to expect as the pandemic-induced macro volatility recedes. This moment was always coming, but almost on cue, we now have to contend with a litany of downside risks in the form of a real-income sapping rise in energy prices and a real estate crunch in China. These headwinds haven’t put much of a dent in risk assets, yet. The MSCI World and S&P 500 are down a paltry 1.5% and 2.5% from their highs at the start of September, respectively, and are still holding on to handsome year–to-date gains, 14.7% and 18.9%, respectively.
Read More