It’s been a while since I updated these pages, mainly because I have recently moved across the country, back to the Big Smoke, where I am now nestling in the hopefully up-and-coming part of southern London. I will be up and running with my market updates and videos soon enough, but first things first. I have been sitting on this piece, mentally more than anything, for a while, and I thought it would be a nice way to re-start my posting. I have long been thinking about whether it is possible to provide a good quantitative argument in favor of the defunct value equities, or more specifically the value “factor”. I think it is, but as always, I leave to you to judge. In my last post before my temporary hiatus, I made the argument that the vast majority of investors are structurally short volatility. Accepting this premise raises the obvious question; how does one achieve a cheap and effective long vol position? In this post I will try to offer a concrete and quantitative perspective on this question using the simplest tools available to us from finance theory. Before I get to that, though, I want to state the problem more precisely. In a nutshell, the traditional 60/40 portfolio is doing too well. The increasingly concentrated leadership in equity beta centered around the ubiquitous growth factor—essentially U.S. technology firms—and the correlation of this position to the performance of government bonds—driven by structurally falling interest rates—has been a boon for investors. A 60/40 portfolio with a concentration in growth stocks has increased by a factor of almost 4 since 2010, beating the MSCI World by almost 25%, not to mention breezing past the main regional indices—MSCI EM and MSCI Europe—by a factor of 2-to-2.5. That’s great news, but it also puts investors in a bind. If a balanced portfolio is winning on both legs what happens when the tide turns?
Read MoreI meant to publish this entry before I went on holiday, but time got the better of me. My initial impression of markets and the economy as I get back in the saddle is that I haven’t missed much. As such, after hitting F5 an awful lot of times to pull my spreadsheets into the present, I am left thinking about the same themes that I have since Covid-19 ripped up the script. Actually, I am pondering the same themes that I was mulling before the virus too. Economists and analysts are running out of ways to describe the current regime, but in a nutshell, the state of play is as follows. The virus was the straw that broke the camel’s back, prompting policymakers to double-down on the fascinating experiment they have been flirting with, in some form or the other, since the onset of the great financial crisis. How much fiat currency can be created before it either destroys capital markets via inflation, or perhaps more likely, sows political disaccord, if not outright kinetic conflict? I am neatly leaving out the prospect of policy actually getting it right, which is to say; the idea that a new equilibrium is obtained which allows monetary and fiscal policy to seamlessly leave the stage. After all, why would policymakers give up the power that they’re currently being offered by economic events? Luckily the answer to the first part of this question seems to be a very long time, and quite possibly well within the investment horizon for many investors. As a result, investors are being invited to pick up dimes in front of the proverbial steamroller, at gunpoint for added effect. History suggests that they will do just that, until something breaks.
Read MoreThe Narrative™ is treading water at the moment, consistent with price action. The direction still looks decent for the bulls, but it’s getting a bit choppier, which is not a huge surprise. The global equity index is up by 35% since the lows three months ago, but the next three months won’t be as spectacular. This is not a huge insight, leaving the main question of whether equities edge higher, even at a slower pace. The simple stock-to-bond model discussed last week suggests that they will, by 5-to-6% over the next three months to be exact, but it’s probably best not to not hold me on that prediction. Meanwhile, investors and analysts continue to have the same tedious debate about the likelihood of a "V-shaped" recovery, and whether markets will sell off if we don’t get one. This conversation on occasion takes place at an extremely low level of sophistication, so just to make it clear. A V-shaped rebound in growth indicators and surveys, the latter which are often normalised around a trend of ‘zero' growth, is not the same as a full recovery in the level of output. Yet, the idea that markets will sell off if a V-shape in the economic fails to materialise is still presented with alarming regularity. I am not sure how it ever got to this. A full recovery of output always takes a long time after a recession, but markets don't wait around. After the financial crisis, for instance, real GDP in the US didn't fully recover until in the first half of 2011, at which point the MSCI World has already rallied by a cool 92% of its lows. In other words, markets trade on the margin of the data, and that margin is currently well-oiled by policy.
Read MoreI have belatedly revived my Youtube Channel, with two videos. The first elaborates on the points I made in my recent post about the state of the world—and my dissatisfaction of it—and the second updates my view on markets in line with points I made here, with a shout out to two other podcasts that I think you should check out; the BIP show and Odd Lots. I will try to do a video once a week, and I will think about uploading the MP3 files for people who prefer to listen, without watching. The point is that it’s impossible to start with an audio file and upgrade to a video, but the other way around is relatively easy. I am not willing to revive my Soundcloud account, though, but I think Squarespace supports an Apple podcast channel. Stay tuned. In any case, you head over to my Youtube channel and subscribe if you’re just interested in that type of content. Alternatively, I’ll post everything on the main blog.
Read More